|
|
|
|
|
| Immediate Release |
Thursday, March 6, 2008 |
| For Information Contact |
798-5800 |
|
|
|
|
Picente: State Cost-Shifting Hurts Counties “The
state is trying to dig itself out of a budget hole by burying counties in a
pile of higher taxes,” Picente said. “Trickle down costs hitting county
governments adds to the local tax burden and is a step in the wrong
direction. This budget puts new mandated costs on the backs of county
taxpayers without giving county governments any ability to control those
costs.
Oneida County Board of Legislators Chairman Gerald Fiorini also
expressed deep concerns over the impact of the budget on Picente noted several areas of concern: Juvenile
detention: The state budget shifts the full cost of juvenile detention
onto counties. Costs are currently split 50-50. “This is not reform. This
is not trying to use better services to achieve better results,” Picente
said. “Counties have no say in the decisions Family Court judges make. All
the state wants us to do is pay the bill so it can walk away from costs that
keep increasing every year.” Picente said Welfare
costs: The state budget cuts the state share of the Safety Net and
Family Assistance programs to drop by 2 percent, forcing counties to pay a
higher share. “Not only does this change impact counties that are already
into our fiscal years and working in the constraints of adopted budgets that
must be cut if the state gets its way, this cost shift to counties comes at
a time of rising needs when economic hard times for our people will drive up
costs far beyond state estimates,” Picente said, noting that the change
will cost Oneida County a projected $542,106 over the next two years. He
also noted that another Social Services cost shift reduces state aid by
35% for Child Protective staff who are required by the state, costing
CHIPS
Highway Revenue: “At a time when the infrastructure of County needs
increased efforts to be upgraded for the future, this reduction – part of
a statewide reduction imposed in the budget – impedes local efforts to
upgrade roads and provide for safe highways,” Picente said, noting that
the loss to
Community
College aid: “The Executive Budget’s
reduction in state aid for Community College students has a serious impact
on the Picente said that a proposal in the budget to allow counties to increase revenue through an increase in mortgage recording fees is not an acceptable solution to the state’s cost-shifting. “Shifting the costs of state programs onto everyday people who pay these fees is just as bad as shifting it onto the backs of property taxpayers,” Picente said.
Picente also clarified the impact of the Medicaid
cap passed three years ago. “The state cap has prevented huge cost spikes,
but it does not take this burden away from
Picente also noted that |
|